💊 An actual fat loss hack


Hey,

It's time for another instalment of the Vitamin––the weekly fitness newsletter that helps you be healthier, stronger, and leaner while navigating fitness bullshit.


An actual fat loss hack

There's no shortage of fat loss hacks in the fitness space.

From magical supplements claiming to 'boost' your metabolism and turn you into a 'fat-burning furnace' (whatever the fuck that means) or fitness influencers incessantly prancing around the gym, believing their workouts are burning thousands of calories.

Unfortunately, all of these are just straight up bullshit.

And unless you're an athlete whose literal job is to work out, your weekly exercise routine isn't burning as many calories as you think.

BUT, there's one thing that isn't bullshit. And if there were an actual fat loss hack, this would be the closest thing to it.

It's called NEAT, and we're going to talk about it.

Wait, what the heck is NEAT?

NEAT, or Non-exercise activity thermogenesis, is the component of your metabolism that accounts for all movement that isn't intentional exercise, like walking, fidgeting, etc.

Why should I care?

While the other components of your metabolism can't be changed much, NEAT is the one component that can significantly impact how many calories you burn each day.

For example, one study looked at the effect of occupational intensity on energy expenditure. [1]

As the image above shows, the difference between 'seated work; no option of moving' and 'seated work; requirement to move' is 300 kcals/day. Going from 'seated work; no option of moving' to 'standing work' is a 100% increase in energy expenditure.

So, it's not hard to see how low levels of NEAT can affect your progress. Working out for an hour 3-4 days per week is only 2% of the week. Even 5-7 days of exercise only accounts for 4% of the week, a very small sliver of time compared to the time you spend not exercising.

In contrast, increasing the amount of time you spend moving every day could increase your energy expenditure significantly.

Moreover, research into NEAT and fat gain suggests that people who increase NEAT in response to overfeeding gain less fat than people who don't increase NEAT as much (or at all).

One study fed healthy participants 1000 kcals/day over their maintenance intake for eight weeks. The participants who gained the least fat ramped up NEAT significantly (up to ~700 kcals/day). [2]

Higher levels of NEAT could also play a role in successfully maintaining your weight loss. Ostendorf and colleagues found weight loss maintainers took more steps per day compared with normal-weight controls and controls with overweight/obesity. [3]

Quick aside: While we often think of NEAT as 'walking', this isn't entirely accurate. Walking does fall under NEAT, but a lot of NEAT isn't under our conscious control. For example, some people are naturally more 'fidgety' than others. But because walking (or light activity) is the one thing we can control, it's a good general proxy for NEAT. Alright, let's keep it moving.

But there's more to NEAT than just increasing energy expenditure

One study followed ~4000 men and women for 12.5 years and found individuals with higher levels of NEAT saw a 27% risk reduction of CVD events and a 30% reduction in all-cause mortality. Interestingly, these results were independent of how much regular physical activity they were doing. [4]

How much of a difference could this really make though?

Here's a hypothetical example of how much difference NEAT can make to daily energy expenditure in two people of the same age, sex, body weight, and body composition who engage in similar physical activity levels.

In both individuals, the energy expended from the resting metabolic rate, thermic effect of food, and physical activity is the same. The difference in their energy expenditure comes wholly from NEAT. Consequently, someone with higher levels of NEAT could eat a bit more during a fat-loss diet or maintain their weight on more calories, increasing the likelihood of long-term weight loss success.

While the above was just a hypothetical, there is evidence lending support to this idea.

A 2016 study found low energy intake paired with low physical activity levels was a significant predictor of future fat gain. [5] In contrast, the Look Ahead Trial found higher levels of physical activity accompanied by higher food intake was associated with weight loss maintenance over a four-year period. [6]

One reason for this could be due to something called 'energy flux'. At the end of a diet, you can approach weight maintenance in one of two ways:

  • 'Low flux': You continue eating fewer calories relative to what you were eating before, paired with low levels of physical activity
  • 'High flux': You increase your physical activity and eat a bit more food, which could help reduce hunger and increase the chances of maintaining your weight.

While both states lead to energy balance, a high-flux state could help mitigate weight regain by better regulating appetite and closing the ‘energy gap’–the difference in energy requirements before and after weight loss.

As I explained earlier, there's only so much physical activity you can do during a given week, but you can increase light activity every day by implementing small but manageable strategies like parking further away at the grocery store, taking the stairs instead of the elevator, taking calls during a walk, etc.

Yeah, it's not as sexy as the latest 'metabolism booster', but unlike those shitty supplements, it actually works. And it's free.

🔬 Sauces

[1] Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: an analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements, Black AE et al. 1996

[2] Role of nonexercise activity thermogenesis in resistance to fat gain in humans, Levine JA et al. 1999

[3] Physical Activity Energy Expenditure and Total Daily Energy Expenditure in Successful Weight Loss Maintainers, Ostendorf DM et al. 2019

[4] The importance of non-exercise physical activity for cardiovascular health and longevity, Ekblom-Bak E et al. 2014

[5] Low energy intake plus low energy expenditure (low energy flux), not energy surfeit, predicts future body fat gain, Hume DJ et al. 2016

[6] Four-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with long-term success, Wadden TA et al. 2011

Share the Vitamin

A lot of time and effort goes into writing these weekly emails.

If you enjoy and find value in them, it would mean a lot to me if you could let others know about the Vitamin.

You can share on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, or Email.

Or, just copy and paste the link below via email or social media (or however else you want to share):

[RH_REFLINK GOES HERE]

If 2 people join using your unique referral link, I'll send you the Vitamin archive – you'll get sent a link with access to all 100+ issues, plus all future issues for free.

You currently have [RH_TOTREF GOES HERE] referrals.

If someone forwarded you this email, you can learn more about the Vitamin and subscribe here and get all future issues directly to your inbox. My emails are free and your information is protected. No spam or any funny business. Unsubscribe at any time.

•••

–Aa

P.S. How did you find this week's instalment of the Vitamin?

👍 Loved it | 👎 Hated it


Aadam Ali

I’m a fitness coach who writes hard-hitting, evidence-based fitness content that makes all this training and nutrition stuff simple to understand.

Read more from Aadam Ali

Hey, It's time for another instalment of the Vitamin––the weekly fitness newsletter that helps you be healthier, stronger, and leaner while navigating fitness bullshit. Is full-body training better for fat loss? As far as muscle and strength gain are concerned, the way you set up your training split doesn’t seem to matter all that much as long as you’re doing enough training volume each week. [1] But what about fat loss? Could a certain training split be better for shedding body fat? That’s...

Hey, It's time for another instalment of the Vitamin––the weekly fitness newsletter that helps you be healthier, stronger, and leaner while navigating fitness bullshit. The stuff that *actually* matters The wellness industry wants you to believe you have to optimise every iota of your life to be healthy, and it’s bullshit. In reality, if you do the following, you’re ticking almost all the boxes for being fit and healthy. Body composition Body composition – i.e. muscle and body fat – have a...

Ayo, Guess what I did this weekend? Don't worry, I'll tell you. Potty training. Yep. Amara started to show signs she was interested in the potty. Like, for example, taking off her nappy, standing next to the potty, and peeing herself while standing next to the potty. Not on it. Next to it. For the uninitated, allow me to explain what potty training consists of. We decided we didn't hate ourselves enough so we opted for the three-day intensive approach that claims your child will be potty...